Dissonance Cognitive :
– Festinger, L. (1957) A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. California: Stanford University Press.
– Vaidis, D. C., & Bran, A. (2019). Respectable challenges to respectable theory: Cognitive dissonance theory requires conceptualization clarification and operational tools. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 1189. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01189

Théorie de l’engagement :
Kiesler, C. A. (1971). The psychology of commitment. Experiments linking behavior to belief. New York: Academic Press.

Cartographie des différentes stratégies de réduction de la dissonance :
– Rothgerber, H. and Rosenfeld, D.L. (2021). ‘Meat‐related cognitive dissonance: The social psychology of eating animals’, Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 15(5). https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12592
– Bastian et Loughan (2017) Resolving the Meat Paradox: A Motivational Account of Morally Troublesome Behavior and Its Maintenance. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1088868316647562

Dissociation et distanciation :
– Rothgerber H. (2020). Meat-related cognitive dissonance: A conceptual framework for understanding how meat eaters reduce negative arousal from eating animals. Appetite, 146, 104511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2019.104511
– Kunst, J. R., & Hohle, S. M. (2016). Meat eaters by dissociation: How we present, prepare and talk about meat increases willingness to eat meat by reducing empathy and disgust. Appetite, 105, 758–774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2016.07.009

Stratégies directes :
Les 4 Ns :
– Piazza, J., Ruby, M. B., Loughnan, S., Luong, M., Kulik, J., Watkins, H. M., & Seigerman, M. (2015). Rationalizing meat  consumption. The 4Ns. Appetite, 91, 114-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2015.04.011
– Joy, M. (2010). Why we love dogs, eat pigs, and wear cows. An introduction to carnism. San Francisco, CA: Red Wheel/Weiser.

Protocoles expérimentaux sur la démentalisation :
– Bratanova et al. (2011).The effect of categorization as food on the perceived moral standing.
of animals https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2011.04.020
– Bastian, B., Loughnan, S., Haslam, N., & Radke, H. R. (2012). Don’t mind meat? The denial of mind to animals used for human consumption. Personality & social psychology bulletin, 38(2), 247–256. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211424291
– Loughnan, S., Haslam, N., & Bastian, B. (2010). The role of meat consumption in the denial of moral status and mind to meat animals. Appetite, 55(1), 156–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2010.05.043

Synthèse courte de ces expériences :
– Loughnan, S., Bastian, B., & Haslam, N. (2014). The Psychology of Eating Animals. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(2), 104–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721414525781

Revue de littérature :
– Gradidge, S., Zawisza, M., Harvey, A. J., & McDermott, D. T. (2021). A Structured Literature Review of the Meat Paradox. Social Psychological Bulletin, 16(3), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.32872/spb.5953

L’expérience des insectes :
Martens, Kosloff, Greenberg, Landau et Schmader (2007). Killing begets killing: Evidence from a bug-killing paradigm that initial killing fuels subsequent killing. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207303020. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2007-12969-007

Gino, F., & Margolis, J. D. (2011). Bringing ethics into focus: How regulatory focus and risk preferences influence (un)ethical behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115(2), 145–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.01.006 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0749597811000203?via%3Dihub

Panagiotou E, Kadianaki I. (2019). From cognitive dissonance to cognitive Polyphasia: a sociocultural approach to understanding meat‐paradox. J Theory Soc Behav.;49:235–253. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12201. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jtsb.12201

Échelle du spécisme, corrélation spécisme / autres discriminations et domination sociale :
[voir le script / la vidéo sur le sujet]
– Caviola, L., Everett, J. A. C., & Faber, N. S. (2019). The moral standing of animals: Towards a psychology of speciesism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 116(6), 1011–1029. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000182
– Jackson & Gibbings (2016). Social Dominance and Legitimizing Myths about Animal Use. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927936.2015.1082771
– Dhont, Hodson et Leite (2016). Common Ideological Roots of Speciesism and Generalized Ethnic Prejudice: The Social Dominance Human – Animal Relations Model (SD-HARM). https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2069

Biais de favoritisme pro-endogroupe :
– Tajfel, H., Billig, M. G., Bundy, R. P., & Flament, C. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1(2), 149–178.

Citation :
– Robert A. Heinlein. (1953). Assigment in Eternity. (Sur Raie futée : https://www.instagram.com/p/ChNRzYHjymh/?img_index=1)
– Paul Mc Cartney : https://www.paulmccartney.com/news/if-slaughterhouses-had-glass-walls-everyone-would-be-vegetarian
– Dowsett, E., Semmler, C., Bray, H., Ankeny, R. A., & Chur-Hansen, A. (2018). Neutralising the meat paradox: Cognitive dissonance, gender, and eating animals. Appetite, 123, 280–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2018.01.005

Analyse matérialiste du spécisme et publispécisme :
– Playoust-Braure, A. (2018). L’élevage comme rapport d’appropriation naturalisé. https://www.academia.edu/45624259/L%C3%A9levage_comme_rapport_dappropration_naturalis%C3%A9

L’article de philo morale qui s’appuie sur la dissonance pour expliquer qu’on a d’autant plus de raison de douter de certaines intuitions morales (ici le spécisme) si on sait qu’elles résultent non pas de raisonnement rationnelle mais de rationalisation du à la dissonance cognitive :
Jaquet, François (2019). A debunking argument against speciesism. Synthese 198 (2):1011-1027.